In terms of pure sequential speed, the jump from Vertex 2 to Vertex 3 sees a performance increase of over 90 per cent. Putting those numbers into perspective, a last-generation Vertex 2 was capable of read speeds of up to 285MB/s, write speeds of up 275MB/s and 4KB random writes at up to 50,000 IOPs. OCZ's officially quoting mind-boggling sequential read and write speeds of up to 550MB/s and 525MB/s, respectively, while 4K random write performance is rated at 60,000 IOPs. However for buyers that plan to use the SSD for several years, long after the original three year warranty, additional longevity in combination with the increased performance may very well be worth the small price premium the OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS brand commends.OCZ's Vertex 2 was arguably our pick of the bunch when it came to high-performance SATA 3Gbps SSDs, so we'll be first to admit that we've been expecting great things from its SATA 6Gbps successor - the Vertex 3.įirst unveiled at the Consumer Electronics Show back in January, the Vertex 3 SSD makes use of a second-generation SandForce controller that hopes to fully utilise - if not saturate - the bandwidth available to the SATA 6Gbps interface. It offers quicker application load times and higher 4KB random IOPS, but also a price premium to match. The OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS 240GB drive is everything the original V3 is and a bit more. We awarded the OCZ Vertex 3 240GB our Editor’s Choice award for good reason it delivered unparalleled performance at its predecessor’s price point with no caveats we could find, beyond cost of entry. The OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS offers the best performance that can be found in a non-PCIe SSD, without a single one of the caveats PCIe drives are currently forced to endure. And if you are looking for the absolute best performing SSD to buy, the Max IOPS is certainly it. The performance differences are stark in extreme usage scenarios or most types of server workloads, but unless the drive will be used in those scenarios the price premium of $30 (or $50) isn’t justified, at least by the performance alone.Ĭonsumers looking to buy an SSD and keep it over the long haul, namely several years past the three year warranty period, might have justification for the Max IOPS due to the additional longevity the 34nm NAND will provide. The standard 120GB Vertex 3 is available at $259 ($239 after rebate), while the 120GB Max IOPS model retails around $290 at time of this writing. As we mentioned briefly on the first page, this difference results purely from the number of NAND die per channel and is easiest to understand by viewing the table we put there. The difference is large enough to warrant mentioning, so keep this in mind if deciding between the 120GB Vertex 3 and its Max IOPS sibling. However, consumers considering the 120GB sized drives should be aware that there will, in fact, be a larger performance difference between the 120GB Vertex 3 and its Max IOPS counterpart. Because we were “only” able to test 240GB drives, this review only shows the performance differences between the 240GB Vertex 3 and the 240GB Vertex 3 Max IOPS SSDs. For simple daily desktop use the differences are minimal and wouldn’t be noticed through normal use.Īs many consumers will favor the 120GB drives for their favorable blend of price and performance, we should take care to highlight one important fact about these SSDs. The OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS certainly lives up to and will even exceed the Vertex 3 in many tasks, but it only shows its true strength in the most demanding and rigorous tests we have. That brings us to the drive in question, the Max IOPS. Today, such performance can be had from a single SATA 6Gbps SSD, at lower cost, and with none of the caveats of the PCIe-based drives. Even just last year, the performance that the Vertex 3 and Vertex 3 Max IOPS can deliver was only possible through complex PCIe cards that featured two, or sometimes four SSD controllers striped in RAID 0 arrays. Given the nature of the Vertex 3 Max IOPS, we thought it would be interesting to include the original Vertex in our tests to see just how far these drives have come in a short two years.